I want to thank a perceptive reader for passing along this insightful post regarding freedom, choice, commitment, and restlessness. It is well worth reading both as a life lesson and as an insight into trading problems.The key idea is that we can only maximize our freedom through commitment. While it may seem that unlimited choice offers the greatest opportunities for freedom, that generally is not the case. When supply is unlimited, value is reduced: unlimited choices lower the value of each marginal selection. To maximize choices, we should probably always eat at buffet and salad bar restaurants. That, however, would not necessarily maximize our dining pleasure: a more limited, gourmet selection is likely to prove more satisfying.
Similarly, we could have a different bedroom partner every night, but would that maximize either freedom or well-being? A slave to passions, like the glutton at the buffet, is hardly free. A long-term romantic relationship offers a depth and breadth of experience that can only be found in the context of commitment.
I believe the same principle applies to trading. At some point, we have to commit ourselves to the trade and gain the profits and confidence that result from a market move that reaches its targets. Too often, traders seek the freedom of trading in and out of their ideas, never seeing their positions through. That isn't freedom--most often, it's giving into fear--and it rarely maximizes opportunity.
When I had to submit a picture of myself to my university alumni book, I sent the above photo. It's no mistake: I think of myself as part of a couple, part of a family. In that commitment, I've found greater freedom and fulfillment than I ever knew as a restless single person. It is the same with our trades and plans: when they are working for us, we stick with them and see them through. Promiscuity in trading works about as well as it does in relationships...and for much the same reason.
.


6 comments:
Hello Brett,
Nice post and wondeful thoughts as always, but I have a question for you.
I wonder if you agree with Bill Eckhart that trading is an emotionally negative proposition. My experience is the same as his: because most of my system trades are losers, one has to wonder where exactly the freedom and satisfaction come in (regardless of the fact that the occasional huge win more than outbalances the small losers).
Human psychology is such that 1 win = 1 agreeable feeling, and 1 loss = 1 disagreeable feeling. Feelings don't seem to correspond to the SIZE of the losses and wins relative to each other.
Incredibly, profitable systems that have more losers than winners FEEL like losers.
Could the solution be to design a system that has more wins than losses? (i.e. Mark Cook's system with many more many more wins but a 2:1 Risk-Reward ratio).
Thanks.
Could this be a person-dependant thing ? based on his personality / childhood/bringup etc ?
some people certainly cant eat salad everyday and find satisfaction in it.
Or some may not need the secure/stable environment for making commitments.
Maybe a balance has to be found between diversity and stability, for the commitment to be more fruitful/rewarding.
Promiscuity in trading--what a good way of putting it!
Though the lure of supposed freedom is often presented as the reason for folks eschewing commitment, I think that easy gratification and aversion to hard work constitute an even larger basis for shying away from knuckling down and sticking to a plan/routine. And yet as you point out, when we do commit, that is when we ironically are the freest to be able to do some truly marvelous things.
It is difficult to trust a trading plan, just as it is to trust a person in a relationship. But, after a while, we then wonder why we ever thought it was difficult. Of course, it ain't easy to find a life partner or a trading plan!
A nice tribute to your most successful and long standing "pairs trade" - cheers!
Great post Brett.
Love your insight Brett- it's a pleasure reading your tweets daily b/c it's not just about $$$
Post a Comment