In the wake of hedge fund losses and several outright scandals, there is understandable concern about the industry. I'm sure that we'll see increased regulation and oversight going forward, we'll see less leverage, and we'll see better due diligence on the parts of investors (and maximum transparency from funds themselves).
The financial industry itself, however, has become a poster child of greed and a whipping boy in the recent crisis. To be sure, the AAA securitization of dodgy home loans has its share of culprits among investment banks, ratings agencies, regulators, congresspeople, and government-sponsored enterprises.
Hedge funds, however, make for particular targets as--one recent article put it--"legal scams" in which "investors pay through the nose for something that isn't what it's cracked up to be". Forget the fact that the article simultaneously blames funds for not protecting investors on the downside *and* for causing the market decline with its short selling. The major thrust of the article is that this is not a legitimate industry; that it's a vehicle for greed, pure and simple.
I work with hedge funds and, as a psychologist/coach, I get to know the management and portfolio managers personally. The ones I have worked with have responsible risk policies, feel a strong commitment to investors, and indeed invest heavily in their own funds. When investor money was plentiful, they expanded their markets and strategies and, in some cases, got caught in markets that rapidly lost liquidity and value. Even so, they have held the downside well and, for the most part, are making money in 2009 with relatively plain vanilla strategies and modest risk levels.
I am confident that there will be a hedge fund industry in the future, though the shakeout has been and will be severe. Those firms that survive will be ones that managed risk well through this period of volatility and reduced liquidity, offering consistent risk-adjusted returns and superior transparency for investors. These firms eat their own cooking; the life savings and careers of the partners and portfolio managers are on the line. I see the concern for markets and investors in their conversations, and I see their responsible commitments in their policies and management.
No one asked me to write this, but it needed to be said: not all hedge funds are scandals or dens of greed and vice. I have years of work with portfolio managers and senior management that shows me otherwise. The entrepreneurial spirit they embody--not any bailing out of failed business models and organizations--will be what lifts the American economy from its weakened condition, as it has always been a driver of growth, innovation, and prosperity.
Brett Steenbarger
.
Thursday, March 05, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)


11 comments:
Brett, you probably know you're preaching to the choir in your blog, but I've passed your post on to a few semi-financially literate friends who have some misguided views on hedge funds.
Good post.
Don't read articles from "Vanity Fair".
Dr. Steenbarger,
The most amazing thing - even more than seeing rating agencies lowering their ratings... now?! - is to see politicians who took bribes (errr... contributions) from lobbyists for years now tearing their clothes.
http://www.dilbert.com/strips/comic/2009-02-25/
Best trading,
Jorge
There is the old saying that it's not an industry but a compensation scheme.
The key thing is that the incentives have been too standardized and many times don't match the needs of investors.
Hedge fund buyers should be pushing aggressively to identify the good managers (yes, there are many) and limit themselves to the ones that have payoff structures that work for both parties.
http://rurl.org/1dd4
The problem with such 'recent articles' is that the writers have an axe to grind.
They want to write provocative pieces because those are the ones the magazines are going to buy. Do you think Vanity Fair would be interested in printing your response? Of course not.
In addition to the intent to be inflammatory, too many writers don't understand the topics they cover. They write to sell articles and make a living. Getting the facts straight or presenting an unbiased point of view is not important to them.
Mark
Thanks for these words of truth.
"I am confident there will be a hedge fund industry in the future"
Of course, they just won't call it a hedge fund. There will be another euphemism for it. (laughs)
Marc
Hey Brett! Very good comment! The media is as usual painting a very bad picture of hedge funds. Most people are generally pretty clueless how hedge funds operate. I guess it is human nature to blame something that you do not understand.
I myself work in a hedge fund as a risk manager and not surprisingly we have had a very rough few months in particular from investors who seem to use us as an ATM. We did have losses for 2008, but they were by far not as bad as the general equity markets and it could have been much worse had we not started to liquidate positions earlier in 2008. Of course if we could put our hat out and ask for a bail out, it would feel great, but we know this is not going to happen so we are trying to be as innovative and flexible as possible and work ourselves out of this situation and hopefully come out alive at the other end - the human way, we are excellent to adapt, but the process of doing it is not always that fun.
BTW, really enjoy reading your insightful posts. Maybe we should have some of our traders have a talk to you :)
Jens
Brett, Thanks for your post. Good to have some insights from soemone involved.
I guess the problem I have with the funds management industry generally is that it's interests are generally deliberately not well aligned with the clients interests. Fro that reason I have always simply traded on my own account - I beleive it is the most moral thing to do.
Hedge funds are generally a bit better than most on that score but still not great and obviously it varies widely. Great to hear that many who run hedge funds have all their own money in the funds! I would not trust a hedge fudn manager who did not have most of their net worth in the fund.
I do question why virtually all fee structures in hedge funds have a big incentive for outperformance but no big penalty for underperformance. Surely this leads to the implementation of strategies that lack risk aversion.
I saw some intersting long term figures on hedge fund performance versus dollars invested in hedge funds. Seems like the vastly increased amount of funds in the industry has resulted in a steady and large decrease in performance over the past 30 years. On that basis average hedge funds outperformance (as as group) is going to be pretty ordinary over the next decade which makes it hard to justify high fees.
good article
what i don't like is these guys evening blaming banks, aig, etc, let alone hedgies.
look, it was a black swan event. if aig is stupid for letting a black swan event trip them up, then so is every homeowner that now can't pay their mortgage. why is there a difference? when aig can't pay, they are guilty of not planning. when a homeowner can't pay, they are a victim. can you see the political motivation to treat them differently?
Thanks much for the comments and perspectives. There's an old adage that bear markets return capital to their rightful owners. It will be interesting to see who those owners are several years from now--
Brett
Post a Comment