It's difficult to fault the performance of XOM stock (blue line above), as it has nearly tripled in the recent bull market. Interestingly, however, over the past decade, XOM--denominated in barrels of WTI crude--has actually fallen in valuation. In other words, crude oil has handily outperformed XOM stock.
Another way of viewing this relationship is that, given XOM's ability to at least replace reserves, investors are placing a lower value on each barrel of oil-equivalent owned by XOM. That fact is masked in the price action of XOM only because oil itself has been rising so quickly.
When we look at the bull market period of 2003 - present, however, we can see that XOM price has been trading at an average valuation of 1.1 x the price of a barrel of crude oil. The bull market in XOM is a function of the bull market in crude, not a richer valuation of XOM.
Why might the market not price XOM as a higher multiple of crude? Several reasons come to mind:
* Ecuador
* Venezuela
* Bolivia
* Nicaragua
* Russia
* Kazakhstan
All of these countries, to varying degrees, have moved toward nationalization of their oil assets. This has left the oil multinationals with fewer areas for exploration, particularly given competition from China in Africa and Southeast Asia and the failure to reach a privatization accord in Iraq.
What that means in practical terms is that the upside for share prices of multinationals such as XOM is increasingly dependent upon a continued rise in oil prices. Should the price of oil fall due to a slowing world economy, XOM's share price could take a hit even if it maintains a 1.1 multiple of crude. At a multiple below 1.0, which we've seen several times during this bull run, XOM could retrace a chunk of its bull gains during an economic slowdown.
RELEVANT POST:
A Little Known Energy Stock That's Powering Higher
.


4 comments:
Dr. Brett,
the info displayed, and the relationship you present reagrding the price of oil relative to the stock price of xom, reminds me of the first thought that occurred to me when a short while back you presented a chart of the s&p earnings, and observed it was little wonder that stock index prices are so high/no bear in sight, etc.
At that time, it seemed to me that if the same info were shown, witht he earnings adjusted for inflation for the same period, (50 or so years earnings data), that a case may be made that stock prices are as high as they have ever been, relative to inflation-adjusted earnings that underlie those stock prices, and, that by extension, may make the picture appear extended.
I noticed a decrease in institutional ownership in XOM this last quater.
Hi Abel,
Great idea; I might tackle the "inflation adjusted earnings" theme in a future post. Thanks for the suggestion.
Brett
Hi High Probability Trader,
Yes, thanks for the info. My measure of "technical strength" shows a fair amount of weakening among energy issues.
Brett
Post a Comment